Rotten Tomatoes, a movie review aggregator founded in 1998, is one of the most trusted sources for ratings. But there’s a reason they get it wrong sometimes: People lie! In fact, according to an analysis by The Guardian , more than half of all reviews on Rotten Tomatoes are self-reported and not from professional critics. If you want the real truth about movies instead of what websites think is “good,” here’s where you can find them!
There are far more great movies than what Rotten Tomatoes might make you believe. The “best movies 2012 rotten tomatoes” is a list of the top 100 best movies in 2012 according to Rotten Tomatoes.
The Internet has the ability to both unite and divide people. That isn’t anything new. People’s views on a variety of topics, from politics to cuisine, may be magnified, as has arguably been underlined more than ever in recent times.
Not surprisingly, this applies to movies as well. Dedicated fans have been expressing their admiration for the chosen film. Detractors, on the other hand, have their say. And, on sometimes, the latter of the two receives more attention than it should. And certain websites may be more responsible than others. To be clear, I’m going to make a few of franchise references here.
Ones for which I’m a true believer and a card-carrying member of the fans. Despite the fact that my own beliefs may sometimes creep in, I will continue to approach many issues objectively. But you’ve been warned if you have an issue with it.
Websites like Rotten Tomatoes shouldn’t be given such a high level of respect.
The website Rotten Tomatoes has grown in popularity over the years. Before things go off the rails, they’re probably beginning off with good intentions. In essence, the website compiles evaluations from both professional reviewers and the general people for films and television shows. In theory, a rating system that determines how excellent or horrible a film or television program is. On a scale of 0 to 100, projects are graded on how ‘rotten’ or ‘fresh’ they are.
The fresher they are, the greater the proportion is. And, presumably, the better they are, the better they are.
But that isn’t how it works in reality. The equality of everyone’s viewpoint should be a cornerstone of this idea. In the United States, anyone’s opinion from any news source in any state should be valued equally. Other nations are similar.
On Eunomia, you may discuss this news.
However, Rotten Tomatoes and other comparable sites, such as Metacritic, do not operate in this manner.
Rather, certain reviewers from certain publications are given more weight than others. On the surface, it seems to be unjust. Then you get into additional thorny issues like who determines which critics are “better than others.” It’s also likely to contribute to the site’s strange statistics.
Their own algorithms can determine if a film’s reviews are more than 50% good. However, you must be below 50% on the rotten-to-fresh tracker.
What is awarded the so-called fresh status and what isn’t is a little puzzling. The website provides a set of criteria for determining whether or not something is new. That’s all right. However, it seems to be common sense that anything that receives a majority of favorable comments should not be regarded bad—yet it was issued with ratings as low as 59 percent and was deemed a flop. So, people labor hard on a project, it’s released, and the majority of people praise it. Despite this, a website with an absurdly disproportionate amount of credibility labels it as poor.
Many films have a bad reputation.
Following the recent release of “Eternals,” issues with services such as Rotten Tomatoes and even Metacritic have become even more obvious. Another installment in Marvel’s enormous cinematic universe. Some complaints, notably on its exposition, have been made in general reactions. However, it has received a lot of great praise for aspects like its cast and graphics.
According to The Guardian, the film has a distinct vibe from past Marvel films. It isn’t flawless, but it serves its purpose well. As previously stated, several of the critics were not pleased with the revisions. Some of the same people who have been complaining about Marvel’s formula being too repetitious.
This is a notion that I completely disagree with. However, with a brand as large and long-running as Marvel, it makes sense to try something new now and again. It’s hypocritical to criticize anything when it’s exactly what they’ve been asking for. Due to the film’s director, Chloe Zhao, there have also been charges of partiality.
According to Deadline, “Eternals” opened with a “dominant performance” at the box office. It might be another sign that professional reviewers don’t have much influence on people’s watching preferences. According to various sources, including Rotten Tomatoes, “Eternals” gets high audience ratings. However, individuals should be aware of these numbers as well.
Scores from the audience are likely to be more accurate than those from reviewers.
Other occurrences include’review bombing’ and ‘vote brigading.’
Inaccurate narratives may gain hold even among the broader people. We can see instances of this in Marvel once again. It may sometimes be an unintentional error. Because of the sudden finale, it’s easy to believe that “The Amazing Spider-Man” movies were a flop. There were more planned, and then there weren’t. In reality, the crowds were well-received by both audiences and reviewers, and the production was financially successful. However, the character was shifted to the MCU, along with a lot of the behind-the-scenes personnel. Rather than explaining a franchise merger, decision-makers chose to just reinvent the brand.
However, there are other, more harmful operations at work. Onlookers have termed the practice ‘vote brigading’ and’review bombing.’ Basically, a film starts off with a favorable rating. Then, with a strategy in place, a gang of Internet users sets out to artificially lower the scores, at times investing a painfully ridiculous amount of effort to deceive others.
This occurred with “Captain Marvel” in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Perhaps no brand has been more heavily attacked than “Star Wars.” More particular, since 2015, fresh films have been released. Prequels published around the same period have generally been well received. The sequels, on the other hand, have been a source of dispute.
The conclusion of Ben Solo’s journey may be quite frustrating. Some aspects may be criticized. In retrospect, it’s insane that directors opted to ‘wing it’ with Rey’s narrative from film to film. But, on the whole, they’re fantastic films.
With the release of “The Last Jedi,” the chaos appeared to gain a grip. The first reaction was very positive, possibly too positive for some fans of the series. She was enraged that it was scripted to be as excellent as, if not better than, the original films. Others were disappointed when their fan theories didn’t come true.
An apparent mix of original cinema aficionados went to the internet. Scores were soon brought down after they had been gleaming.
The tendency was quickly noticed by many readers. At first, our old colleagues at Rotten Tomatoes downplayed the tendency. However, they would soon admit that the film had been’seriously targeted’ by review bombers. The second sequel, “The Rise of Skywalker,” saw similar circumstances.
There are many great movies that are not on Rotten Tomatoes. Movies like “The King’s Speech” and “12 Years a Slave” are some of the best movies out there, but they are not included in the list. Reference: rotten tomatoes best movies 2014.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does any movie have 100% on Rotten Tomatoes?
A: There are currently no movies that have achieved 100% on Rotten Tomatoes. It would be impossible for any movie to do so, because there is always at least one person who hates the movie and will give it a bad score just to spite everyone else.
Is Rotten Tomatoes credible?
A: Rotten Tomatoes is a movie review aggregator that rates movies. It does not rate the credibility of its reviewers, nor does it take into account critic reviews or critics themselves in any way shape or form.
Why are Rotten Tomatoes bad for film criticism?
A: Rotten Tomatoes is not the only critic website. Its just one of many that people use to get their opinions on films. There are tons of other sites out there, so feel free to check them out if you want an alternative opinion or a more in depth analysis.
- worst movies of all time rotten tomatoes
- rotten tomatoes best movies
- rotten tomatoes netflix
- rotten tomatoes rating
- list of movies with 100% on rotten tomatoes